God's Elect

The Pope's Visit to Israel in May 2009

2009-07-09T07:22:00.000-07:00

See: http://ezinearticles.com/?expert_bio=Frank_Shapiro

Is Pope Benedictus XVl resuscitating the Donation of Constantine?
by
Frank Shapiro

Author of “God’s Elect”

2009-06-07T21:43:00.000-07:00

KMA 960 AM
June 3rd , 2009

Larry Shannon introduces Frank Shapiro

and discusses world predicaments and

“God’s Elect”

Live Radio Interview

2009-05-27T23:17:00.000-07:00

The Zelda Show
Station: CHIN FM 100.7, AM 1540Show: Morning Location: Toronto

Live Interview on Monday May 25th 2009 8:30 am
Special Guest speaker:
Frank Shapiro
Topic: “God’s Elect” and Global Themes

2009-05-19T02:38:00.000-07:00

Station: WSAT-AM
Morning Show

Buddie interviews:
Frank Shapiro
on his book
“God’s Elect”
and World Predicaments
Friday 15 May 2009 8:20 am

Radio Interview on Lee Klein Show

2009-05-07T02:39:00.001-07:00

The Lee Klein Show

WWW.CRNTALK.COM

May 6 2009

Lee Klein introduces Frank Shapiro
and discusses his book
“God’s Elect”

Like to be entertained?
This is the show for you. Join Lee weeknights and listen to
his analysis of everything from sports to world politics.
MONDAY - FRIDAY 8-10 pm PT (Live)

Is there a linkage between Pope Benedictus XVI and Pope Urban IX?

2009-02-25T23:00:00.000-08:00

Beware of Lupus clothed as Agnus

What is the Pope’s political agenda in coming to Israel? And don’t tell me he doesn’t have one. The plethora of instances wrought with papal political targets crowd the historical timeline. Popes striding into our salons should keep us well on our toes. The Papal See’s official spiritual stand shouldn’t be treated lightly. No pope wishes to enter the celestial spheres without leaving his imprint on worldly history. Benedict’s predecessor, Pope John Paul ll, was one of the most political popes we’ve ever witnessed in the last hundred years. He never flagged in his endeavors in undermining communism and bringing back the atheistic pagans of the Soviet Union into the fold of Christianity; he never wavered in his aims to restore his Polish homeland into the lap of Roman Catholicism. Let’s not be too gullible when popes raise their spiritual staff in blessing – it’s nearly always to attain political goals. And so, when Pope Benedictus XVI sets off on his first trip to Israel this coming May we Israelis shouldn’t be sparing in our demands: first and foremost – the Vatican must return our Temple Treasures!

Getting to know "God's Elect"

2009-02-25T05:11:00.000-08:00

A newly elected Pope makes a historic decision in the wake of the world’s worst terrorist outrage. He will share the Vatican’s oldest secret with Israel’s Chief Rabbi. On Jerusalem’s Temple Mount masses demonstrate for the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple. What could stop them if the Temple Treasures, looted two thousand years ago by Rome’s triumphant Roman general Titus, really have come to light? Yet nothing is as it seems. Behind this new Pope’s statesmanlike gesture lies a sinister plot hatched by a fanatical sect. Unsuspected and seemingly unstoppable, this sect worms its way into the heart of Christendom determined to change the fate of the world. Behind these events stands a clash of civilizations now teetering on the brink of war. Menaced on all sides by hostile Islamic states and in fear of nuclear attack, Israel has to decide whether to co-operate with the papacy – even as suspicions mount that each side is as diabolical and deceptive as the other.

2009-02-24T05:23:00.000-08:00

My reasons for writing a historical novel

I have occasionally been asked why I, as a historian, chose to write fiction rather than continue to write factual history. I can give you four personal reasons why I chose this path.

First, I’m not sure whether many historians are not occasionally stricken by the yearning to bend the facts of history, but if this does happen I presume the pricking of a guilty conscience immediately calls them to order. Playing according to scholastic rules means writing history as objectively as possible and that kind of approach conjures up a kind of straightjacket. This objectivity rejecting any personal slant is the norm of any historian. Tempting your fingers to type out a subjective historical interpretation would obviously mean betraying the ethical code of professional conduct. While writing my previous two history books I occasionally felt those twinges to slightly play down historical objectivity at certain dubious points but nevertheless I made a constant effort to demand the hallowed objectivity of myself when donning my historian’s hat. However, I promised myself that one day I would indulge and enter the channel of historical fiction.

Oh, to create a historical novel – some kind of counterfactual history.

My second reason for writing a historical novel is what I call the ‘black hole of history’. Allow me to explain. What bothers me about history is what we don’t know; I’m specifically referring to the black holes of knowledge. Being a historian I’m constantly aware of the fact that the sources we do have available do not tell the whole tale. Take the history of the Middle Ages, is it really all about the tug-of-war between royalty, aristocracy and church? Where are the masses, what did they really think and prioritorise? Were they as religious as we’re made to believe by the sources describing the rise of the Gothic churches. After all, we certainly know who wrote this information or disinformation: it was a wafer-thin stratum of highly motivated literate churchmen who had the monopoly on the media and a definite agenda. In the seventh century, the largest and greatest repository of human knowledge – the library at Alexandria – was burnt down. The ashes of those scrolls contained virtually the entire repository of extant sources of human knowledge till that time. The flames devoured most of everything known to those times – unimaginable assets of information written on parchment and vellum scrolls which had no backup or microfilms. This example of what I call the ‘black hole of knowledge’ leads me to the conclusion that how ever much we may read and assess from sources about the world leading up to the seventh century, we can never get anywhere near the real picture. Hence, in steps the writer of historical fiction: imagination and fictitious writing might well fill these black holes with plausible historical suppositions.

My third reason for writing historical fiction concerns the priority or hierarchy of the importance of information. For instance, not too many people are aware of the fact that between the years 1918 to 1920, the pandemic of influenza wiped out close to fifty million people across the globe. Very little has been written about this extraordinary catastrophe – why? The answer is simple: the Great War, the First World War, overshadowed all else. Another instance of the ordering of events: editors of newspapers and other media receiving thousands of bits (and don’t forget the bites) of info each day; they – human beings – decide what is considered newsworthy, what we, the reading public, should imbibe and not read, and more to the point, in what order of preference and importance we should make our acquaintance with the information. Needless to say, the overriding mass of accumulated information is, of course, thrown into the dustbin – indeed, the dustbin of history. But what has been thrown into the dustbin of history? That is only left to the imagination. Hence, why shouldn’t I play my part by endeavoring to pick up some of those scraps and process them into a novel? I hope you’ve caught my drift.

My fourth and last reason for writing historical fiction relates to my sense of historical awareness. I tend to read news and assess events in a historical framework. I consider and weigh up the impact of contemporary events and fit them into a strategically geo-political framework. I don’t automatically accept the editor’s priortisation and intuitively see the tapestry of contemporary history unfolding before my eyes. Genocide in Darfur, ethnic clashes in India, the rising temperature at the polar caps, the clashes in the Middle East, Basque terrorism, radical Islam, speeches by the Pope – are all equally important at first, only gradually, with foresight and hindsight, perspective and moderation can anyone fit the pieces of human interaction in any digestible formation. What we see, hear, and perceive is the very stuff of history. And so this personal experience provides me with facts and imaginary scenarios that can be wielded into a thousand stories.

_____________________________

So these are the four points constantly swimming around in the aquarium of my historical mind: the yen to bend history, how to relate to the black hole of missing information, the dictated information hierarchy and agenda, and taking into account my acute awareness of living history. These elements are the building stones for my historical alibi to burst the seams of the straightjacket of historical objectivity and write my novel, God’s Elect.